Can we keep it in with a 'use at your own risk and peril'?
I don't think that spending energy on 1.4 bugs is wise, but if someone
finds them, let 'em fix.
--
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services
Hyderabad, India
On Thu 15 Sep 2011 07:15:06 PM IST, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:38:04 +0200
Fridrich Strba
<fridrich.strba@graduateinstitute.ch>
wrote:
Hello, Michael,
On 15/09/11 15:06, Michael Stahl wrote:
just noticed David's commit to move around the fix for a broken IBM
LinuxPPC JRE:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ab5ce3f70a5635c3ca141b5c8928a104b522e1bb
AFAIK the OOo JRE baseline was raised to 1.5 some years ago, right?
so 1.4 seems obsolete and we can get rid of it now?
No real baseline for us here. It is true that our release builds for
linux, we build them with --with-java-target-version=1.5 using 1.6 as
javac. Nevertheless, if a fix for 1.4 is reasonably cheap, it cannot
be bad to keep it building.
OTOH 'mostly working on 1.4' doesnt help anybody and creates useless
bug traffic -- better clearly state its unsupported and be done with
it. And even small fixes for obsolete stuff can stack quite high (just
look at all the Win16 optimizations in the codebase).
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.