Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Licensing is very difficult question for me. I contribute some code [patch] without any limitations. So, if it is easier to integrate patch under LGPLv3/MPL licenses then I say «LGPLv3/MPL».

30.08.2011 20:37, Tor Lillqvist пишет:
Any code [patches] from me is always under normal license of LibreOffice.
Unfortunately that is not quite clear enough; you need to say exactly what license(s) you mean.

--tml




--
Best Regards,
    Dmitry

begin:vcard
fn:Dmitry Ashkadov
n:Ashkadov;Dmitry
email;internet:dmitry.ashkadov@gmail.com
note:JID: dmitryash@jabber.mipt.ru
version:2.1
end:vcard


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.