static sal_Unicode *table_PersianWord_decade1[]={
(sal_Unicode[]){0}, // 0
(sal_Unicode[]){0x06cc, 0x06a9, 0}, // 1
…
};
is not valid C++03 (and neither is Eike's version using the ArrUnicode
typedef). To be standards conform (and hence maximally portable) would
require the more verbose
OK. But it is too verbose ;)
Any other solution? what about the following:
static sal_Unicode table_PersianWord_decade1[][MAX_LEN]={
{0}, // 0
{0x06cc, 0x06a9, 0}, // 1
...
};
Although it uses more memory, but it is less vebose.
What's your opinion?
Elahi
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.