On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:53:25 +0200
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz> wrote:
libreoffice-3.3.* are missing in the "translation" repo because we
used "l10n repo for LO-3.3. Is this the problem? Or are the tags
missing in more repositories?
They are missing in core for all repos but bootstrap mostly. The cause
is likely the whitespace stuff Norert mentions down the thread. I tryes
to automagically recreate them using some "git bisect" scripting
(mostly because I wanted to use bisect so bad I tried to train myself a
bit with it) but my approach failed.
I am a bit curious because I tag all repositories using a script. I
would like to fix if it is broken :-)
They ended up in the original repos but not in core. Manually finding
the corresponding commit is likely the best way to recreate them. Or
has somebody a good idea(*) for a script? After all ~6tags*15repos are
roundabout 100 tags to manually identify.
Best,
Bjoern
(*) One would be: when we have tags for libreoffice-3.3.0.3 and
libreoffice-3.3.1.1 to do a
git rev-list \
$CURRENTCOMMIT ^libreoffice-3.3.0.3 --pretty="format:%at" \
|grep -v ^commit
for CURRENTCOMMIT in `git rev-list libreoffice-3.3.1.1
^libreoffice-3.3.0.3` and find the one that diffes the least from the
output for the old repos.
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.