Yes, read support is required ("shall") for ODF 1.2 consumers. Writing is a "should."
-----Original Message-----
From: libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm.org@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm.org@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Caolán
McNamara
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 03:11
To: LibreOffice
Cc: Thorsten Behrens
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] default ODF encryption/checksum algorithms changed in master. Good thing
?
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 11:05 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Since 5dd2784030e00fa1857b30ee8c5da62e221bfd32
a) is this a good thing that should be welcomed, with a "users using
older version of LibreOffice/OpenOffice.org should upgrade and/or hassle
their vendors for patched versions with support for these backported"
a.1) which suggests we should add read support for the above into our
3-4 stable branch if we think "its a good thing"
C.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.