Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] [PUSHED 3-4] fix for bnc#707486

Hi Kohei
On 29/07/11 17:01, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:48 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
>
> > perfect sense. In this case, I don't see it will make any difference, so
> > you can change the order to the way it was or not as you wish ( I have
> > no preference )
> Ok.  Pushed to -3-4 with the lines flipped back (so that I can rest
> easy).
>
> Kohei
It appears another tweak is necessary, somewhere between when I tested 
and posted the patch I must have changed this line, the only other 
explanation is that somehow this worked randomly :-( ( it doesn't for me 
in the latest build ) Could you do the honours and review/commit ?

Noel

diff --git a/sc/source/ui/view/viewfun3.cxx b/sc/source/ui/view/viewfun3.cxx
index 8358b56..222571a 100644
--- a/sc/source/ui/view/viewfun3.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/ui/view/viewfun3.cxx
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ sal_Bool ScViewFunc::CopyToClip( ScDocument* pClipDoc, const ScRangeList& rRange
             if (!bValidRanges)
                 break;
 
-            pDoc->CopyToClip4VBA( aClipParam, pClipDoc, false, bIncludeObjects );
+            pDoc->CopyToClip4VBA( aClipParam, pDocClip.get(), false, bIncludeObjects );
 
             ScChangeTrack* pChangeTrack = pDoc->GetChangeTrack();
             if ( pChangeTrack )