On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:35:23 +0200
Robert Nagy <robert@openbsd.org> wrote:
I would like to ask my fellow developers to be more careful
about merging and _touching_ files at all that they don't
understand. During the last two days I had to fix several
problems that were introduced by merging changes, hell I
even found files with _conflicts_ in them and the guy who
pushed it did not even bother to have a look.
Which part of these quotes:
"Brace for impact - gnumake4 to hit master"
"As this changes a lot of low-level build system stuff, there will be
quite few temporary instabilities and problems (esp. on non-Linux
platforms) after the merge."
"If nobody protests, I will merge the branch to master on Sunday
afternoon, so that I wont break the master for volunteers on the
weekend, and so that we have good tinderbox result on Monday."
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Brace-for-impact-gnumake4-to-hit-master-td3192816.html
was hard to understand?
As there is no tinderbox for BSD, you could have at least tried to test
build the feature branch. From the warning email until integration, you
had two days for that. If you would have needed another one, you would
have got it. However, nothing wrt that was heard from you.
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.