Re: [Libreoffice] Still no Python scripting framework activated on Mac OSX with daily builds from master

Alexander Thurgood <alex.thurgood -AT- gmail.com>
Sun, 24 Jul 2011 08:48:26 +0200

Le 23/07/11 13:19, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :

Hi Christian,

No, you're wrong, it is all answered in the issue you filed, in the
mail-thread you started, in the TSC minutes.


Thanks for reminding me.


System python that is used is incompatible with python 3.0 compatible files.

So if you want python-extensions, you don't have any other choice than
to compile with internal python (which is python 2.6, and that is
forward-compatible to 3.0)


So that then begs the question as to why the currently provided Mac
daily builds, to which I was referring, and which I am attempting to
test, are not compiled with the internal python ?

If I have understood your point, the buildbot should compile with
internal python which would then solve the problem of the Python
scripting framework not being available.



Alex

Context

[Libreoffice] Still no Python scripting framework activated on Mac OSX with daily builds from master · Alexander Thurgood
- Re: [Libreoffice] Still no Python scripting framework activated on Mac OSX with daily builds from master · Christian Lohmaier
  - Re: [Libreoffice] Still no Python scripting framework activated on Mac OSX with daily builds from master · Alexander Thurgood

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.