Re: [Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch

Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard -AT- googlemail.com>
Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:03:00 +0200

Looks good to me. Will push it to 3.4.

2011/7/19 Muthu Subramanian K <sumuthu@novell.com>

Hi,

It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly in
builds from 3.4 branches.

Thanks to Markus (moggi) for debugging this to quite some level (and
also for fixing one part of the problem (defined name ranges) - that fix
is already reviewed+pushed).

Thanks & Regards,
Muthu Subramanian

Context

[Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · Muthu Subramanian K
- Re: [Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · Markus Mohrhard
  - Re: [Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · Katarina Machalkova
- Re: [Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · David Tardon
  - Re: [Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · Markus Mohrhard
    - Re: [Libreoffice] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · David Tardon
      - Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED:3-4; 3-4-2] Review Request: fdo#39023 for 3.4.* branch · Petr Mladek

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.