On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 10:45 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen some patches that were reviewed, but not pushed into the -3-4
branch (!!!), so just to remind you:
- the first reviewer pushes to libreoffice-3-4 (commits/cherry-picks
with -s to get the Signed-off-by: message automatically)
- the third reviewer cherry-picks the commit(s) from libreoffice-3-4 to
libreoffice-3-4-0, again with -s
Also, I'd like to have some consistency in the [REVIEW] tag. We have so
far
[REVIEW]
[REVIEWED]
[REVIEWED - 1 more needed]
[REVIEW REQUEST]
etc.
and I'm having hard time coming up with a good filter rule in Evolution
to include all of these. Evolution doesn't support regexp search which
also adds to the difficulty.
How are others coping with this?
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.