Hi all,
I've just seen that there are cases where that change won't fit the
original code. I'll need some more thinking to make it clean or check
what it breaks.
Don't push it now as it may introduce other bugs (potentially blockers)
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:14 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hi all,
Could anyone review and sign-off this patch in 3.4 branch? The change
from sal_True to sal_False was pretty complex to find out, but I just
reverted it to the value it had in 3.3 sources.
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.