Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 04/05/11 09:20, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :

Hi Kendy,


Some of the tinderboxes cover master, but most important at this stage
is of course the release branch; these are builds of exactly the code
that is going to be tagged as betas / RCs.



Thanks for the links, I'd already noticed that they existed, but most of
the time, they didn't seem to be populated with anything. I see that the
last daily for which files are available for MacOSX was 28/04, even
though there were successful builds at later dates.

How is a tester to know what the correlation is between any build of a
given date and a beta or rc ? How do I know whether stuff that fails on,
say the build of 28/04, has not been fixed by the later date builds, if
those aren't available for me to compare ? I'm just trying to understand
what it is we are actually supposed to be testing with regard to
Michael's comments that we use the nightly builds for QA. As you can
see, I am quite confused at the moment.

Alex


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.