Am Sun, 1 May 2011 19:04:29 +0200
schrieb Andras Timar <timar74@gmail.com>:
2011/5/1 Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de>:
It turns out no installation set at is created. Shouldn't it be put
under
instsetoo_native/unxlng*.pro/LibreOffice/installed/install/en-US/?
No. You can run 'make dev-install' and have a symlinked installation
under $SRC_ROOT/install. Would you like to build packages instead?
Then you need --enable-epm and --with-epm=internal configure switches.
Best regards,
Andras
Thanks. Now I'm a step further.
--enable-epm --with-epm=internal --with-package-format="native"
This creates the installation sets. Also some fat download tarballs
that I don't want.
I guess this is what I want to install into our distribution package:
ls -1
instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/LibreOffice/native/install/LibO_3.4.0beta3_Linux_x86-64_install_en-US/linux-2.6-x86_64/buildroot/opt/libreoffice/
CREDITS.odt
LICENSE
LICENSE.odt
THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html
basis-link
basis3.4
program
readmes
share
ure
Can I prevent the creation of all the spec files and RPMS directories(no rpms being created)?
I also get install sets in SDK, helppack and lang directory. Can I use them to build splitted
packages?
I guess you could save me a lot of work if you could fix the make $DESTDIR install step
for me to get proper desktop integration. This has worked well until 3.3 releases.
-Andy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.