Michael Meeks wrote:
FWIW - the bogus and over-granular threading approach in existing
LibreOffice code is something that needs beating to death.
LibreOffice threading: "inspired by the java synchronized" keyword is a
nightmare.
True - but:
So - I'm with Kohei mostly - lets not do over-expensive,
non-inline-able nonsense atomic operations when we don't need to.
You need them. Until you've eliminated almost all of the above.
Refcount races are *surely* much worse than the speed penalty of
atomic counts.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
Attachment:
pgpiiJO0Sog2U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.