* Present:
+ Michael, Thorsten, Kendy, Caolan,
+ Norbert, Petr, David, Kohei, Andras
* Previous Action Items:
AA: new Evo addresbook bug - not done (Michael)
download javascript test site setup: Christian did it
post a dependency graph of split modules: Petr posted it.
fantastic conference - blog to follow - Thorsten, done.
* 3.3.2 updates (Petr)
+ no known regressions
+ another successful release
+ several bugs missed the deadline
+ should we have a larger RC / final gap ?
+ are the blockers new regressions ?
+ no - pre-existing bugs people want fixed.
* Actions:
AA: + re-title tracker to "most annoying" from "blockers" (Petr)
AA: + potentially a 10day RC -> release gap better ? (Petr to write up)
* Release planning
+ cadence for 3.3.x stable releases
+ 2 month gaps for 3.3.3+ releases
+ adjusted timeline 3.4.x releases
+ tinderboxes to provide pre-RC builds
+ most developers bug-fixing on 3-4 branch
+ with regular merging to master
+ first releases by April.
+ plan for 2x Betas + 3x RCs once
per week come April
* 3.4 pieces:
+ Merging status / retrospective (Norbert)
+ getting import right key
+ pre-merging not such a great idea
+ much easier merging m103 etc.
AA: + ideally work on per-CWS merges (Norbert)
+ work needed to overcome re-merging issues.
* Feature freeze:
+ branch April 1st ...
+ breaks to feature-freeze allowed if approved
by 2x others with different/no affiliation
* un-splitting git repo
+ tinderbox + automated bisection is harmed by split repos (Norbert)
+ bisecting merges from elsewhere makes bisection hard (Kendy)
+ split build helps build time and dependencies (Kendy)
+ want to split GNOME + KDE backends too
+ not necessarily the same as split git (Norbert)
+ can bloat SRPMS hugely / require re-packing (Kendy)
+ parallelising merging is hard (Michael)
=> good idea to have since repo: re-evaluate
+ if we have gnumake in place - for robust incremental building
+ and smaller / individual CWS merging
+ need to exclude l10n and system stuff.
+ concern with git commit -a (navigates entire repo)
+ ensure no unbearable performance issues.
* l10n changes (Andras)
+ pushed framework into git, with 2 langs
AA: + further integration (Petr)
+ transparent for developers
+ .po files stored in repository
+ Makefile extracts a new en_US SDF from the source
+ and delivers SDF particles to the target dirs
+ more organised translation storage
+ translators work on .po files anyway
+ from pootle / or external sources.
* Lubos' overriding / warnings goodness
+ exactly the warning, that would have detected automatically
some recently problems.
+ Caolan builds with warnings as errors
AA: + commit it / futher investigation (Caolan)
* Bjoern's initial impressions thread / summary (Bjoern)
+ build.pl - errors / usability etc.
+ punted due to meeting conflict.
* Anything else that is happening
+ nothing this week.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- [Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ... · Michael Meeks
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.