Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3

Michael Meeks <michael.meeks -AT- novell.com>
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:11:43 +0000


On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 16:57 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:

Could someone familiar with that code (Cedric, Caolan?) sign it off and
cherry-pick, please?


Done for 3-3, not for 3-3-1 though, that needs more acks.


        Patch looks ok to me :-) - just that one-liner, affecting RTF export
only right ? one more & we're good for merge to 3.3.1 I guess.

        Thanks,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Context

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Miklos Vajna
- Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Caolán McNamara
  - Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Miklos Vajna
  - Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Michael Meeks
- Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Cedric Bosdonnat
  - Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Petr Mladek
  - Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][PUSHED] RTF unicode export - need patch review for -3-3 · Petr Mladek

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.