Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:04 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
there were more patches not yet pushed, so I've applied them. I didn't 
touch the files which differed only by whitespace. And I didn't delete 
comments containing bugids and text. This I would like to leave for the 
experts  :-)

You were right not to delete those comments entirely... they can be
useful.

Yep - though in general, these '#123456#' bug ids can be elided -
the usually-followed convention is, that those are bugids of
StarDivision's old internal bugtracking system (and '#b123456#' the
ones from Sun's internal bugtracker) - so they're of no value to the
general public. Public OOo bugs are usually marked as '#i12345#' -
still worth checking though via

http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=<bugid>

whether just by chance someone forgot to add the 'i'.

So in this case, it would have been ok to remove the bugid, but
leave the rest of the (quite useful) comment.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: pgpi5eETX5Pb8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.