On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:44:03AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> wrote:
humm... what build.git ? :-) on master I do not even clone build.git anymore...
Then bootstrap.git, you get it. :)
;-)
(I mean tinbuild would push the contents of git-heads.txt to a
githeads.git, then 'g bisect' would call 'git bisect' in githeads.git and
after the working directory is updated there, it would check out the
commits in the repos based on git-heads.txt so that it's possible to do
the actual testing. That's not so hard to implement for bisect
start/good/bad/reset.)
How about having a after-push git-hook in the master branch in our
git.fdi/git/libreoffice/* git repos that generate the list of
HEAD-sha1
that was you should be able to almost-completely bisect.
sure in some cases the fact that 2 commit in two git are
interdependent would throw off the bisection. but that is not that
common.
Another problem would be merge of feature branches, which would be
counted as just one bisect step for the whole branch.... (but that is
true even with the tinderbuild based solution)
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.