On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 09:44 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
Caolan - are you happy for this:
commit 6c01edfe66d6e350b20178d9ab367806d956cb46
Author: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Nov 11 13:31:33 2010 +0000
Resolves: #i25247#, #i25561#, #i48064#, #i92341# CTL/Other Default
Font
to go to libreoffice-3-3 ? if so, I guess that's fine without
further
review; at least it looks like an Oracle patch to me - 'ftcAsci' eg. ;-)
Its my patch, so I'm happy with it by definition, and someone else
probably needs to do a quick review of it. "ftcAsci" is the spelling
used in the MS docs for this (IIRC), not mine.
The intention for my original post is two fold:-
1) I'd like to know when/which-version will this fix land in.
2) I'd like to understand the policy for development vs. release branches.
For example, which committed patches will be in the 3.3.1 or 3.4 release.
How things like this are planned/decided (which used to be group by child
workspaces before).
--
_/|\_ Samphan Raruenrom. Open Source Development Co., Ltd.
Tel: +66 38 311816, Fax: +66 38 773128, http://www.osdev.co.th/
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.