Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Soeren,

On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 09:33 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
Thank you for your answers, I will try both approces.

       Oh - fun :-) is a complete expunging of the obsolete types not
possible ?
..
I very much hope it is possible, but tools/list is in the codebase
used for both classic list purposes and for situations where the
object is created once, is sorted, and then there is a lot of random

        Ah - right :-) so, I suspect the common way to handle these is simply
to look around at the code accessing a given list, and consider how
frequently it is likely to be accessed. The std::vector also (kohei
suggested) is fast to append to if we do it carefully - so ...

        Ultimately, run-time profiling will only show you what your data set
touches, and (as yet) we have no reliable set of representative calc
documents together to know what they look like ;-)

        So - I would personally, just recommend converting them using a bit of
common sense / poking around to infer their use. We'll get performance
regression complaints later if we go too far wrong no doubt :-)

        Thanks,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.