* Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com> schrieb:
Sure - and we are trying to fill out this niche; primarily by moving
(slowly) towards a split build [ in fact openSUSE does this already ],
whereby you can re-build and develop only one piece at a time - which is
quicker: ie. just re-compile 'writer'.
The clean answer is to actually split the whole monster into
smaller packages, which can be built an deployed completely separately.
Just had a look at the 'bootstrap' tree: it contains a full copy
of dmake (even worse: with utogenerated files ;-o) - that would be
my firt candidate for being kicked out. Generic buildtools should
never be bundled into individual application's source trees.
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.