In general the patch looks mostly good. I wouldn't mind a second opinion from Kohei, though, in
case there is something calc-specific I haven't thought of.
Some comments, though:
1) You also change the spacing style to have just one space separation. I didn't check if you do it
consistently in every case, but anyway, I think you should separate the patch into two: One that
does semantic changes (changes types) and another one that makes spacing and indentation consistent
with surrounding code.
2) You initialise OUString variables as ::rtl::OUString aDefArgNameValue =
::rtl::OUString::createFromAscii("value"). The recommended way is ::rtl::OUString
aDefArgNameValue( RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM("value"))
3) There really is no reason to use explicit 16-bit loop counters in general in for loops in cases
where for the code inside the loop it doesn't matter what integral type the loop counter is (and
there is no intentional overflow of it (lol)).
Just use int instead and let the compiler choose the most efficient way to compile it. So instead
of changing
for (USHORT i =0; i < LIMIT; i++)
foo(array[i]);
to
for (sal_uInt16 i =0; i < LIMIT; i++)
foo(array[i]);
just change it to
for (int i =0; i < LIMIT; i++)
foo(array[i]);
Thanks,
--tml
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.