Michael Meeks píše v Pá 14. 01. 2011 v 09:23 +0000:
Hi Petr,
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 21:25 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
could you please review the attached patch for libreoffice-3-3 branch?
Looks good to me; the method takes OUStrings, so there is no odd type
co-ercion (that I can see) going on.
thanks for review; I have got approval also from Noel and Tor, so pushed
even to the libreoffice-3-3-0 branch.
It looks like a compiler bug. I see it only on SLED11 with one
particular gcc version. So, the solution is a kind of workaround but
it should be fine in general. See the patch for more details.
Personally, I don't believe we need such a huge block comment on this
(in master at least):
// add temporaries to workaround gcc-4.3.4 specific bug
Fair enough ;-) I have simplified the comment to
// pass the two values via variables to workaround gcc-4.3.4 specific
bug (bnc#655912)
would be fine for me - and (after long experience) I trust your
analysis of tangled compiler breakage :-) you have run the 'working' ie.
non gcc-4.3.4 version through valgrind to ensure that the bug isn't
there but hidden for some other reason ?
Yup, valgrind havn't seen any problems on openSUSE-11.3.
Best Regards,
Petr
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.