On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Lior Kaplan <kaplanlior@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for choosing .po over .sdf or .xliff, the number of tools designed
to edit and/or manage .po files is much more than the other two
formats AFAIK.
+1
+1 for .po and svn (or git, whatever version management tool is fine to me)
subversion is a bit easier to use than git but I think most translator
will leave the
review/commit cycles to the translation leads :)
svn/git is a must, I need them as a tool for tracking the changes.
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{remove}@gmail.dot.com , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16plus
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle · Nguyen Vu Hung
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.