https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
--- Comment #45 from Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz> 2011-01-04 05:12:38 PST ---
(In reply to comment #43)
Note that there seems to be some confusion about what it means to "nominate" a
bug here.
In my opinion, nominating a bug as a blocker is just a request for comments and
discussion that eventually then will end up with a consensus (or developer
decision) to accept or reject the bug being as a blocker.
Others seem to take each nomination as an immediate change in status of the bug
to blocker.
Which is correct? Is "nominate" a synonym of "make a candidate", (as in
"nominate somebody to be a candidate in an election") or a synonym to "make"?
I do not have any strong opinion here. I think that both ways are fine and it
depends on the reporter's confidence. If it is evident blocker, it might be
added to bug dependency immediately. If the reporter is not sure, it might be
enough to mention it in the comment... We must investigate all nominated bugs
before the release anyway. We could remove bugs from the list if there is a
good reason and vice versa...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.