Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 08/12/10 16:22, Noel Power wrote:
For this patch I am not familiar with the writer bits involved, so I am not sure if there would be some side-affects. Personally I'd like to understand why the "explict check in the output" doesn't get applied in this case, I'll at least try and see where this is done to see if I can see any obvious risks. If I don't see anything ( or nobody else objects ) I guess we can shove this into master, I'll look a little more at this later. Thanks again for looking though, nice work !!
Looking at this today I was worried that changing the type of the bool variable might cause problems ( because it's possible the variable/value would be reused in an expression ) but looking further in the writer code every where a boolean operation is performed it seems the variables userd are converted to the boolean type appropriately, so to me ( and really I have only a limited clue ;-) ) I think this is ok, so pushed

thanks again

Noel

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.