Wait - you also complained about RC1's size ? and then again here
with
a link ? :-) and Charles told you're we're working on fixing it, which
is what we are doing ...
No. LO is NOT working on it. This has been discussed on other topics since
late Nov (Beta1 or 2)
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/A-proposal-for-effective-volunteer-friendly-user-support-in-LibreOffice-td1954148i60.html#a1969084
But now Sophie Gautier says exactly the same thing and everybody listens,
but the reasoning is that "now is not a good time because we are already at
RC1"
Just so you know - developer motivation is nearly exactly
-inversely-
proportional to griping :-) Now, it would be great if you could jump in
and help out fix up the packaging - do you have a Windows machine you
can get a build going on ?
I have collaborated (and still do) on several open source projects. I know
that. But sometimes provocation is the only way to get noticed and answered
to...
I do have a Windows machine and I have been testing the builds. I don't know
how to code.
My contribution is helping others on the Users forum.
And I'm willing to report the bugs I find when a proper bug tracker is set
up.
I'm not a leecher or a troll.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Comments-on-RC1-tp2028874p2040567.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Context
Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 · Sophie Gautier
Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 · plino
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.