Hello,
In the file filters/binfilter/bf_svtools/source/items/svt_aeitem.cxx
We've got this :
SfxAllEnumItem::SfxAllEnumItem(const SfxAllEnumItem &rCopy):
SfxEnumItem(rCopy),
pValues(0),
pDisabledValues( 0 )
{
DBG_CTOR(SfxAllEnumItem, 0);
if ( !rCopy.pValues )
return;
pValues = new SfxAllEnumValueArr;
for ( USHORT nPos = 0; nPos < rCopy.pValues->Count(); ++nPos )
{
SfxAllEnumValue_Impl *pVal = new SfxAllEnumValue_Impl;
pVal->nValue = rCopy.pValues->GetObject(nPos)->nValue;
pVal->aText = rCopy.pValues->GetObject(nPos)->aText;
const SfxAllEnumValue_Impl *pTemp = pVal;
pValues->Insert( pTemp, nPos );
}
...
And cppcheck says :
Checking ./filters/binfilter/bf_svtools/source/items/svt_aeitem.cxx...
[./filters/binfilter/bf_svtools/source/items/svt_aeitem.cxx:110]:
(error) Memory leak: pVal
In my opinion it's a false positive since pVal mustn't be destroyed
since it's indirectly used via pTemp in pValues.
Am i right or wrong ?
Julien.
(i just updated cppcheck with git and recompiled it)
Context
- [Libreoffice] question about memory leak detected by cppcheck · Julien Nabet
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.