On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 08:28 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Now that we promote the concept of feature branches, I hope we can
revert this.
We should be using 'git merge' unless it is for a purely local branch
that we are rebasing - surely ? at least - encouraging wider use of
re-base is likely to burn time and motivation - that thing simply
doesn't work for complex cases where there have been multiple merges to
a feature branch [ I got -really- burned with Evolution and a long
running branch here ].
Or did I totally miss the point ? :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.