Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Use a generic unxgcc.mk

On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 17:18 +0100, René Kjellerup wrote:

> Why the oracle copyright notice in the new file too?
> Shouldn't they have a TDF notice instead ?

Yes, for new files, we should use the following header notice.

/*
 * Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+
 *
 * The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version
 * 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
 * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
 * http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
 *
 * Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License
 * for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the
 * License.
 *
 * The Initial Developer of the Original Code is
 *       [ insert your name / company etc. here eg. Jim Bob <jim@bob.org> ]
 * Portions created by the Initial Developer are Copyright (C) 2010 the
 * Initial Developer. All Rights Reserved.
 *
 * Contributor(s): Jim Bob <jim@bob.org>
 *                 Ted <ted@bear.com>
 *
 * Alternatively, the contents of this file may be used under the terms of
 * either the GNU General Public License Version 3 or later (the "GPLv3+"), or
 * the GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3 or later (the "LGPLv3+"),
 * in which case the provisions of the GPLv3+ or the LGPLv3+ are applicable
 * instead of those above.
 */

with (obviously) the name of the developer(s) being you.

This header boilerplate is also available as COPYING.NEWFILES at the
root of the build repository.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/COPYING.NEWFILES

Kohei

-- 
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>