Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

$SUBJECT, and now I wonder how to do it best with master.

Either we can merge the entire libreoffice-3-3 there, or we can merge
just ooo/OOO330_m14, and continue cherry picking between master and
libreoffice-3-3.

Merging libreoffice-3-3 into master (maybe even regularly) will give us
the advantage that we won't forget to add anything that happened on that
branch to master.  OTOH - if we disable/revert something on the branch,
we will most probably revert it (by the merge) in the master too.

Even with this risk, merging from libreoffice-3-3 to master is my
preferred choice, I am more afraid of forgetting something (happens so
often!), than of accidentally disabling something.  Also, when we start
merging more regularly, we can do the fixes that should appear in both
branches in libreoffice-3-3 only, and they will be merged anyway.

I do not want to decide it without consulting you :-) - so comments
appreciated.

Thank you,
Kendy


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.