Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

Thorsten Behrens <thb -AT- documentfoundation.org>

Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:48:07 +0100

Kevin Hunter wrote:

Further (with exceptions, of course), automagic tools provide a much
more consistent and at least acceptable-by-all metric for how code
should look.  (And I would argue that how code looks via the
squint-test is very *much* pertinent for longer term gathering of
new developers.)

Quite. Played with uncrustify a bit, and like it a lot. -- Thorsten

Attachment: pgpEWvcJ2jjKo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.