Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir?

Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian -AT- SSpaeth.de>
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:28:18 +0100

On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:13:35 +0100, Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz> wrote:

And if you have the build dependencies of eg. writer (eg. from your
Linux distro), you shouldn't need any of the other repositories at all,
to be able to build it.


Thanks for the info.

Sebastian

Attachment: pgpoLkR8ssUi4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Context

[Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Jani Monoses
- Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Jan Holesovsky
  - Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Michael Meeks
    - Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Jan Holesovsky
      - Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Sebastian Spaeth
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Jan Holesovsky
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Sebastian Spaeth
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Wols Lists
    - Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Sebastian Spaeth
      - Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Caolán McNamara
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Jan Holesovsky
      - Re: [Libreoffice] build or rawbuild dir? · Michael Meeks

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.