Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Tor,

        Cloph had the strongest view on this AFAIR - from a Mac / build
dependencies perspective.

On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 01:13 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Should we change all the shell scripts that use bashisms on the "upper" level
(from the "build" repo) to start with #!/usr/bin/env bash ? Is that then
(finally) a good and reliable solution to the problem whether to use bash or not

        Personally, since I have no idea what is a bash-ism, and what is not; I
can't promise not to accidentally introduce them. Perhaps if we document
shell fragments that are bad and their 'good' replacement somewhere sane
and build that incrementally then we can all learn.

        Ultimately if people want to incrementally fix bash-isms as they creep
in I see no reason why they should not commit fixes to make it use
generic-shell; hopefully with the gnumake based build we'll have less
shell lying around.

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.