Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:37 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
    My ideal is to have neither an enable or disable flag for any of the
optional pieces: KDE3 / KDE4 / GNOME etc. - but have a default of
auto-detection, so we only build if they are there.

I disagree. Even if you had auto-detection you still need those
options to *explicitely* en/dissable the features. There's reasons
you want to build without that stuff even when present.

        Ah ! you mistake me; for the developers profile (the default build) we
should simply pass no configure option - and the default there should be
to auto-detect.

Everything auto-detected is a sure way to break

        Certainly - so packagers should explicitly pass --enable-foo or
--disable-foo depending on what they want, and if foo is not there it
should then break horribly :-)

        Surely that doesn't create problems for distros ? [ it is easy to add
the explicit flags to the distro configs ]

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.