Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Nadav,

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:00 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote:
Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes.

        Well - that's not really so, we have:

        * a different, flattened code-base
                + [ yes we have some legacy patches still but they
                   are being slowly merged where appropriate ]
        * many more contributers - lots of new volunteers are doing
          great work every day, and more arriving and making a
          difference
        * lots of translators, QA, and well-wishers from the
          old OO.o community
        * oh - and a brand that 'sucks less'(TM), and the new
          website you noticed ;-)

        how deeply are you looking ?

Are there more full time developers?

        Yes, but far more importantly, an extraordinary explosion in volunteer
developers - many of them new to the project: which is most exciting.

Are there more companies that donate developers for that?

        Sure - RedHat is fully involved eg.

Are the releases of the LO depend on Oracle Open Office like LO?
(since also LO is open office version with git of patch differences)

        We will include code from Oracle if it makes sense; of course - why
not, this is Free Softare right ? :-)

When should LO 3.3 release?

        Well we're working towards a first release in the next handful of
weeks.

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.