Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:02:32PM +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
So may be this line:

http://opengrok.go-oo.org/xref/sdk/odk/source/com/sun/star/lib/loader/InstallationFinder.java#195

should contain LibreOffice instead of OpenOffice.org.

yes, looks like.

I know it could be a bit early to points this out, but perhaps this
should be changed.

For Linux, line:

http://opengrok.go-oo.org/xref/sdk/odk/source/com/sun/star/lib/loader/InstallationFinder.java#74

has a "soffice", shouldn't it be "libreoffice" ?

No. soffice (how unfortunate it is) is the publicized entry point for many stuffs, including
this. I don't think this should be changed.

As it's only executed in the install we have (and that one might have a /usr/bin/libreoffice, this 
isn't
necessarily the case, though), this shouldn't matter much but I think we should stay consistent here
(and as long as there is a soffice in ../program ....)

Grüße/Regards,

René

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.