Hello,
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:17 -0400, Jonathan Zacsh wrote:
I'm trying to help out with the "easy hacks" here:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice/EasyHacks?action=show&redirect=Software/libreoffice/EasyHacks
This is my first time looking at this code. A couple questions:
- should I remove @author claims to specific code? (I know other
projects I follow try to avoid @this-code-by so as to keep the code a
_community_ owned thing).
- should I replace strings like "// FIXME blah" with "//@TODO: blah blah"
(so that doxygen and other automations pick these comments up?)
Examples of both of the above are: lines 52 and 355 of
build/extensions/coooder/source/org/openoffice/coooder/comp/HighlighterImpl.java
That one is a bit different as it's an extension (that is not even
shipped by default).
I'm wondering whether this extension shouldn't be moved to some other
git repo (like gitorious) in fact...
Those tasks are to be performed in the clone folder as these are the
sources of LibreOffice.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.