[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: RFE process between QA and UX
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: RFE process between QA and UX
- From: Sophie Gautier <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:32:48 +0100
- To: V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Stuart, all
Le 16 déc. 2014 21:10, "V Stuart Foote" <VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu> a écrit :
> @Sophi, *,
> Kendy may have a different take, but Design/UX elected to not try to do
> on Redmine.
Ok, no problem, as said I'm not aware of your workflow.
> The rub comes in that when posted to Bugzilla, the actions are opened
> Unconfirmed. But they are not issues requiring QA, although anyone should
> fell welcome to comment and get involved from a UX perspective.
Yes, I understand
> Guess issue can simply be set new on opening, and always assign to
> component. Work flow would be to keep these issues open (or maybe
> needinfo) in ux-advise until Design/UX-advise folks agree to move it
> for development, or close it out.
Ok, this is something I'll propose on the QA meeting tomorrow
> Having the proposal in bugzilla greatly simplifies review and discussion
> during Design Hangouts. But understand the QA thrash having the
> bugs cluttering the stats--simple compromise as above.
Ok, thanks for your further explanation. The things is that most of the
times QA team has no clue if it's a valid enhancement or not (because of
missing info in the bug, knowledge, etc). So either they could close a
valid request or accept one which is not possible to implement. See the
example with conditional formating and contextual menu where it now applies
to a range and not a cell.
For both, the submitters and the reviewers, this is not a good workflow.
But what you proposed is a great compromise. Thanks Stuart for all what
you do in our project and the way you do it :-)
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|[libreoffice-design] RFE process between QA and UX||Sophie <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|[libreoffice-design] Re: RFE process between QA and UX||V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-design] RFE process between QA and UX
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-design] RFE process between QA and UX
- Previous by thread: [libreoffice-design] Re: RFE process between QA and UX
- Next by thread: [libreoffice-design] No Weekly hangout on 24th and 31st December (?)