[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters
- From: Laurent Lyaudet <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 21:25:31 +0200
- To: email@example.com
Hi Stefan, all,
Ultimately, this will always be the implementer's decision. Not anyone'sSo the design team should not take any decision ?
in this team.
In this respect, whether our decision is based on reasoning or random thoughts makes no difference.
I prefer to think that the implementer has some sanity and will take into accounts our decisions.
Additionally,The same "no chance" argument apply to all ideals.
1) There is no chance get the majority of [people/users of LibreOffice/
..?] to express an opinion on this matter.
That's not a reason to stop doing any effort in direction of these ideals.
Ultimately, I prefer to try and fail than accepting different forms of mediocrity.
2) Do we actually need everyone's opinion? Or would it make more senseThese two goals aren't contradictory. The goal of my previous mail was to explain that both are needed.
to find arguments one way or another?
We need arguments but in the end there is most of the time no unique logical conclusion,
and that's why we end a democratic debate by a vote in order to have the more representative opinions we can get.
(Maybe we don't need everyone's opinion but we should try to have more representative opinions.)
Solving this is best done via Bugzilla with arguments, not via a pollI don't think Bugzilla is the best place for this because :
that will only give skewed, reason-free output anyway.
- you already provide a privileged solution when you open the bug report;
- it can be done by the devs before a decision has been reached.
We need to centralize the arguments in some place : the archive of the design mailing list does that when you look at a discussion.
We can also put them in the wiki if you prefer.
Clearly bugzilla without the design team knowing it's here is not the best place.
I don't see why a poll "will only give skewed, reason-free output anyway. "
Can you prove it ?
Do you mean people who vote have no reasoning abilities ?
"Yet ?" ? You don't believe in polls but you do believe some day reasoning on design matters will be clear cut.When it comes to design I see a lot of contradicting arguments and mostReasoning on design matters is not (yet?) as clear cut as in
of the time you end up adding "apples" with "oranges" and so on.
mathematics, true. Still, it should be more than people expressing
Design matters try to satisfy the needs of the people.
If one day we fully understand people needs and how to adapt to these needs, I hope we should be able to have efficient polls.
Ok, you wrote your mail as if your aims were arguments against having the choice of colors.Second aim "usable to as many people as possible" : I don't see whySetting a colour that is too light makes LibreOffice less usable to a
having the choice between colors makes it "not usable".
large class of users. That is what I meant here, mostly.
I misunderstood you.
But, of course, you are hinting at it... options come at a price. TheyThe price is not high.
increase the complexity of the user interface, they need to be kept
You don't look at the options in a normal workflow.
The complexity of the user interface is marginally increased in some part that is not often visited.
It's a good example of adding "apples" and "oranges" :
- How to quantify :
-- the gain of usability for some users ?
-- the increase of complexity of the UI ?
- How to compare both quantities ?
"They need to be kept working" : Software, cars, etc. that's quite common.
However, localized features do not need a lot of maintenance.
The Appearance page of the LibreOffice options in particular is alreadyThere is not that much options there.
a graveyard for far too many borderline useless options.
I work on a business application that has 10 times more options than Libre Office.
I do see a problem with the options interface (it is indeed most noticeable on the appearance page) : The window is ridiculously small and you can't extend it.
That's why it feels overcrowded there. Should it be full screen and you'll breath again.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters||"Mirek M." <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Light Blue for Non-printing characters