Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Charles-H. Schulz wrote
What do people think about the download experience of LibreOffice? How can
it be improved? Any
particular idea besides a graphical redesign itself?

I think there should be a clear distinction between early-adopters and
rock-solid LO releases.
Lots of users just download the more recent version (e.g. 4.1.0) and then
claim it's buggy: they simply don't know why there are two versions.
It would be really useful have a tooltip/little description/symbol who says
something like:

( ✓)  LibreOffice  4.0.6 is our conservative and rock-solid version for
professional users.

(!) LibreOffice 4.1.3 is our latest, feature rich version for early-adopters
and casual users.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Website-Redesign-Assessing-the-Download-experience-tp4082534p4083526.html
Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.