Dear All:
It is necessary for all online office interoperability
with each other. Do you think so ?
What I want to do,is not to design a product for my own
company. I just want to , between all online office websites, it can send
documents quickly. Such as ,Google Docs can send documents to Microsoft
Office 365 quickly, and directly . But now , Google Docs can only send
documents using email (SMTP) to Hotmail. So i think HTTP(SPDY) is better
than SMTP for transfer online office documents ? So we should suggest
,IBM Docs and Office 365 ,Acobat.com use the same protocol.
The second thing I want to do ,all online office interoperability .
your know , for native office, an Microsoft Office 2010 document should
be open and reedit by an Openoffice.org user , it means native office
interoperability. Then for the cloud office, it also need
interoperability.
So let us do this thing together!As I know ,you are great man and
warmhearted! ?This thing is charitable.Thanks !
Please see more details in my email attachments! or via a web site:
http://online-office-interoperability.blogspot.com/
Best Regards!
Zhun Guo
Shanghai Biaoma IT Co.
www.mabaoo.com
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: conference+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/conference/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-conference] cloud office document interoperability · zhun guo
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.