Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last


From: Markus Mohrhard [markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 3:13 AM

Thanks a lot for your effort rising awareness of these problems. If
you think it is a general problem that we are not paying enough
attention on accessibility support in new dialogs it would be nice if
you could give us some examples so that we can discuss how we can
improve our workflow in the future.

Markus,

I will try to do exactly that and find an appropriate spot on the Wiki to clarify design and 
development requirements for support of Assistive Technologies and accessibility, probably with 
some linkage to standards work of the cognizant organizations.

In the meanwhile, testing and understanding requirements for including accessibility is well within 
the grasp of ANY developer or user of LibreOffice--we just don't think about it.

Here is my simple guide--and I am not being flippant--this is a reasonable demonstration.
 
So, if on a GNOME Linux, activate ORCA, on Windows JAWS or NVDA, on OSX VoiceOver--then launch 
LibreOffice.

Now close your eyes (or put on a blind fold) and try to write a document--I won't suggest a 
spreadsheet, or presentation, or even an illustration although why not?

How does that work for you? Is the new Template Manager effective?

If we are meeting our responsibilities as supporters of LibreOffice--developers, designers, QA, 
even users--we should be equally effective working with the Assistive Technologies support exposed 
with UNO Accessibility API as with moving a cursor with a mouse.  Anything less and we are not 
meeting our responsibilities. If the GUI can not be made to talk, and does not follow reasonable 
hierarchical structures AT support falters. 

Put another way, if we can not drive the interface without peeking, how is someone who does not 
have that option to cope?  

Additionally, think of the challenge if you can not point with a mouse or type on the keyboard, are 
we helping those users.

Stuart

Cross posting to the devs, and accessibility lists, so apologize now to all who receive multiple 
copies of this post. And again this is not intended to be flippant response, I am simply asking 
folks to consider accessibility aspect of their individual design and development efforts.




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.