[us-marketing] Re: DVD as swag for upcoming OSCON

[webmaster-Kracked_P_P <webmaster@krackedpress.com>]

I have a NA-DVD for Windows and Mac ISO file at 1.9 GB in size,  without 
loosing much of the galleries, clipart, extras, etc., etc..  Those 
things are part of what makes the NA-DVD "/the NA-DVD/".  If you gut it, 
then it cannot be, should not be, the NA Community DVD since the whole 
reason for the DVD was to have all these "extras" so a new user did not 
need to go online to fetch/find them.

I have Windows and Mac installs, but no the portable version.

I kept the dictionaries in tact and the 8 languages for the 
language/help packs.

If you want to see what the Install and the Documentation pages look 
like with this version, here are PDF files of the printed pages.
http://libreoffice-na.us/Win-Mac_DVD_-_Documentation.pdf
http://libreoffice-na.us/Win-Mac_DVD_-_Install.pdf

If you want to have a copy of the ISO, all I need to do is upload it to 
Drew's portal.  Should not take more that a few hours at my 120 KB/s 
limits [due to old cables in building].

Ubuntu tells me the size of the NA-DVD [just created a few minutes ago] 
3.5.4 Win/Mac .iso file is - 1.9 GB (2006429696 bytes) - in size.

The NA-DVD on the LO CD/DVD servers is - 4.0 GB (4266373120 bytes) - in 
size according to Ubuntu.

The essence of the NA-DVD is kept for the Win/Mac only version I just 
made.  There still are add-ons and extras galore to "impress" a new 
user.  There are still over 180 dictionary/thesaurus/grammar extensions 
to impress a new user.  There still are the 6 non-English languages for 
language and help packs.  [The Hebrew language market is one that I have 
been told MSO does not support much, or at least out side of Israel.]

You do not need to GUT the DVD to get the file size down to the 2 GB 
limit of a Thumb-drive.
.

On 06/29/2012 05:06 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> On 30/06/2012, at 1:38, Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com> wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2012, at 16:34, drew jensen wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:23 +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > > > Thanks for this, Drew.
> > > >
> > > > On 29 Jun 2012, at 16:09, drew jensen wrote:
> > > > > 1) Given that LibreOffice IMO really needs to focus on brand building,
> > > > > particularly in the MS Windows space I would first drop all the
> > > > > platforms other then Windows.
> > > > OSCON has a lot of Mac users, so if it's at all possible to shoehorn on the Mac DMG that would be good.
> > > Yeah - I thought about that - it would require bumping something else
> > > out of the image, but that is OK with me.
> > >
> > > > > 2) The current libreoffice-na disk includes additional OSS applications,
> > > > > again I propose to drop everything not for Windows.
> > > > What sort of thing are they? Even Windows add-ons probably aren't essential, and if it makes room for the Mac version all the better.
> > > you can see the original set at
> > > http://libreoffice-na.us/English-3.5-installs/extras.html
> > >
> > > I already ditched anything that was not the latest release for windows
> > > from that list.
> > I'd ditch the lot, honestly.
>
> I agree. It would be better to have NO additional programs and make
> room for the Mac distribution.
>
> > > The larger prize, space wise, is in dictionaries and templates, I would
> > > need to drop something from those to fit the MAC distribution files in I
> > > think, even if I dumped all the extras.
> > Which are you including? I think it's safe to just include US English, and possibly Spanish.
> I agree re dictionaries. And I think we could get along without the
> templates. They are a nice to have, but not essential.
>
>
> > > > > What I would propose is to go ahead and update this cover and the disk
> > > > > label to show that it was distributed at OSCON 2012. I snagged some
> > > > > artwork for doing this, not sure what steps (or rather who to ask) for
> > > > > permission to do so from a trademark perspective - I'm hoping maybe
> > > > > Simon could weigh in on that - if it seems like a good thing to do, and
> > > > > I really think it is, the I could work on the artwork today.
> > > > Happy to help. Since we're representing TDF, I don't think there will be any trademark problems even if you use the marks with the TDF underline, but I'll wait for the gurus to chip in on that too.
> > > I meant if I include some OSCON marks, that is the trademark I'm
> > > concerned with, not TDF.
> > Given Jean and I are both attending multiple events (including CLS) I think it would be better not to mention OSCON specifically.
> Once again, I agree with Simon.
>
> Also, in a previous note in this thread Drew wrote:
> 3) Documentation - again I would pare what is on the disk down. If there
> is a 3.5 guide ready, then drop the older 3.3/3.x docs. DO NOT include
> the odt files, only the pdf files.
>
> Agree. Include only the latest, and only PDF.  BTW, there is a
> complete set of v3.4 guides except for Calc, which will be finished
> just too late for this. Hoping to get it done this weekend, but more
> realistically next week sometime.
>
> Are you including individual chapter files as well as full books? If
> so, drop the chapters to save a bit more space.
>
> Lastly, I'll confirm that Friends of OpenDocument are willing to
> contribute to the costs of production and delivery, as Simon
> mentioned.
>
> Jean



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@us.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/us/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted