[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner?
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner?
- From: drew <drew@baseanswers.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:00:50 -0500
- To: website@global.libreoffice.org
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:08 +0100, Olav Dahlum wrote:
> Well, I just wonder if you really want to start down this path - what
>
> > will be the response when the next issue comes up, what will be the
> > measuring stick used when deciding if it rises to the level deserving a
> > place on our collective resource? Who will decide?
> >
> > Is the website a place to put the protest de jure, shall we have a one
> > day banner extolling the evilness of Twitter for deciding it has to
> > actually comply with the law in the countries it does commerce in?
> >
> >
> >
> We did protest against SOPA and PIPA …
Yes - and so of course it holds that we would do it again - which rather
makes my point. (although I still don't know who 'we' is in that
statement above)
> And it's not over yet. Poor
> decisions made by Twitter won't affect us directly, but ACTA could.
Obviously the actual people involved thought it the correct decision,
and twitter is a service we use and therefore promote.
Which gets me to the crux of the matter - it's not about the specifics
of these two cases, it is about the general question.
If TDF wants to take positions on political issues of the day that's
fine, just recognize that we will be opening ourselves up for some
rather nasty internal debates, assuming of course that the decisions are
made differently from the SOPA protest.
Beyond that - I will not belabor the point, I think you all understand
and I won't push it, it's just a cautionary concern.
Best wishes,
//drew
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
| [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Olav Dahlum <odahlum@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | "Charles-H.Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Rainer Bielefeld <LibreOffice@bielefeldundbuss.de> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Olav Dahlum <odahlum@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Olav Dahlum <odahlum@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Olav Dahlum <odahlum@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | webmaster for Kracked Press Productions <webmaster@krackedpress.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Olav Dahlum <odahlum@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | drew <drew@baseanswers.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner? | Olav Dahlum <odahlum@gmail.com> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner?
- Next by Date: [libreoffice-website] Portuguese website localization and mirror offering
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner?
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-website] ACTA banner?
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.