Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Stefan Weigel wrote:
we do have a page for developers
(http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/) and another
page for QA people
(http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/qa-testers/).

On both the reader is invited to join the developers mailing list
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice).

My suggestion is, from the QA page to point to the QA list
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa)
rather than the developers list.

Hi Stefan,

hmm - one of the early ideas was to not create too much of a
division between QA and development - and thusly the qa list was
intended to be more of an auxiliary place, for making announcements
etc.

Many important information will still only be discussed on the dev
list, so in my mind, it makes sense to have people subscribed there.

At any rate, Cc-ing the QA list - deciding on this should be left to
those doing QA work.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.