Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Pedro wrote
The problem is that it is difficult to find a word that explains that one
version is new (with new features/bugs/regressions) and the other one has
been patched so that new features are already stable.

Is this some sort of l10n/i18n issue? I ask because this problem has been
solved for many other projects and for a great many years. The process is
Development > Test > Production and these terms are widely respected and
understood. Debian uses the variation "unstable", "testing", "stable", and
"oldstable". I think a term like "production" should be considered for the
more mature series. I agree with NoOp on this issue. The current name
choices add nothing of value or clarity.

Best wishes, Owen.



-----
Best wishes, Owen.
--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117407.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.