[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
- From: anne-ology <laginnis@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:13:09 -0500
- To: Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com>
- Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
How old do you think engineering is?
granted this term existed, yet the definition has changed
post-industrialization.
Here are a couple sites which seem to be fairly accurate
historically -
http://www.creatingtechnology.org/history.htm
http://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/192894/careers_and_job_hunting/a_brief_history_of_engineering.html
Also, what you described would not have been necessary until the age
of middle-managers - ca. mid 20C, post WWII
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/16/2012 10:50 AM, anne-ology wrote:
>
>> brilliantly said.
>>
>> And may I add this use of acronyms is silly ... are we supposed to
>> memorize each new one ???
>> here's supposedly a complete listing -
>> http://www.all-acronyms.com/
>>
>> Yes, growing up pre-computers was different from you post-computer
>> youngsters, but bear in mind that using acronyms confuses the
>> communication
>> since many of these are duplicates ;-)
>>
> I should have noted that RFC and the related RFQ (request for quotation)
> are very old engineering acronyms (pre PC) used to describe stages in
> project development. RFC is asking the reviewers to review a draft
> proposal/design/specifications prior to formally finalizing the design.
> Reviewers may be any interested party involved in the project. There may
> not be a formal RFC issued of the complete design/proposal/specifications
> but various interested parties are often asked to review at least parts of
> the design. RFQ is formally asking vendors to bid on the finalized
> specifications.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi :)
>>
>>> Bottom posting is a good way to alienate most of the target
>>> market-shares that LO needs to break into. Many new people are
>>> completely unaware that there is any other way of posting other than
>>> top-posting because top posting is so widespread.
>>>
>>> Also there are a ridiculous number of rules, such as how and when to
>>> snip,
>>> that
>>> makes it more time consuming and difficult for new people that have
>>> only joined the list to deal with one or 2 specific questions, not to
>>> change their entire life-style.
>>>
>>> How about we 1st get the world using LibreOffice and THEN start opening
>>> people to new ways of doing things?
>>>
>>> Oh and this new way of having to use "Reply to all" instead of "Reply" is
>>> brilliant! It makes it more difficult to keep things on-list and more
>>> difficult for new arrivals to the list. Perfect!!
>>> Regards from
>>> Tom :)
>>>
>>>
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
| Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT] Wood chucking | Marc Grober <marc@interak.com> |
| [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed | Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed | Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed | anne-ology <laginnis@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed | Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Excuse me, but your opinion is simply unimportant. Start over and you can expect more of the same.
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT] Wood chucking
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.