[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
- From: anne-ology <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:13:09 -0500
- To: Jay Lozier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
How old do you think engineering is?
granted this term existed, yet the definition has changed
Here are a couple sites which seem to be fairly accurate
Also, what you described would not have been necessary until the age
of middle-managers - ca. mid 20C, post WWII
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jay Lozier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 08/16/2012 10:50 AM, anne-ology wrote:
>> brilliantly said.
>> And may I add this use of acronyms is silly ... are we supposed to
>> memorize each new one ???
>> here's supposedly a complete listing -
>> Yes, growing up pre-computers was different from you post-computer
>> youngsters, but bear in mind that using acronyms confuses the
>> since many of these are duplicates ;-)
> I should have noted that RFC and the related RFQ (request for quotation)
> are very old engineering acronyms (pre PC) used to describe stages in
> project development. RFC is asking the reviewers to review a draft
> proposal/design/specifications prior to formally finalizing the design.
> Reviewers may be any interested party involved in the project. There may
> not be a formal RFC issued of the complete design/proposal/specifications
> but various interested parties are often asked to review at least parts of
> the design. RFQ is formally asking vendors to bid on the finalized
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Tom Davies <email@example.com>
>> Hi :)
>>> Bottom posting is a good way to alienate most of the target
>>> market-shares that LO needs to break into. Many new people are
>>> completely unaware that there is any other way of posting other than
>>> top-posting because top posting is so widespread.
>>> Also there are a ridiculous number of rules, such as how and when to
>>> makes it more time consuming and difficult for new people that have
>>> only joined the list to deal with one or 2 specific questions, not to
>>> change their entire life-style.
>>> How about we 1st get the world using LibreOffice and THEN start opening
>>> people to new ways of doing things?
>>> Oh and this new way of having to use "Reply to all" instead of "Reply" is
>>> brilliant! It makes it more difficult to keep things on-list and more
>>> difficult for new arrivals to the list. Perfect!!
>>> Regards from
>>> Tom :)
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT] Wood chucking||Marc Grober <email@example.com>|
|[libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed||Marc Paré <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed||Tom Davies <email@example.com>|
|Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed||anne-ology <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed||Jay Lozier <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Excuse me, but your opinion is simply unimportant. Start over and you can expect more of the same.
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-users] [OT] Wood chucking