[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper
- From: Katheryne Draven <borgqueen4@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 06:46:58 +0000
- To: users@libreoffice.org
I"m not spreading FUD, I'm speaking from my experience. When I tried
to introduce linux via ubuntu, it was a disaster.
However, given the amount of harsh/childish comments (not you Tom)
I'll keep my experiences to myself.
So much for freedom in FOSS.
I'll end with the fact that some of you should be very ashamed of yourselves.
Kate
On 12/30/10, Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Ubuntu is meant to be competitive with Windows and does a great job of
> bringing
> people into linux-land. A significant percentage learn our values and a
> fair
> percentage find they can contribute to the wider linux community.
>
>
> It doesn't need to be very stable to do that because almost anything is
> likely
> to be more robust than Window (except DVL of course). Anyone really excited
> about stability can move somewhere closer to BSD although i have not had
> problems with stability in Ubuntu.
>
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net>
> To: users@libreoffice.org
> Sent: Wed, 29 December, 2010 23:29:11
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:47:52PM -0500, Katheryne Draven wrote:
>> People, the ubuntus are inherently inferior versions of linux and have
>> a tendency to crash often, especially if the gui is gnome. Please take
>> this into consideration, first look at the environment before the
>> application.
>
> Hey kid, stop spreading FUD. I've used Ubuntu and Debian concurrently
> for the last 5 yrs and while there are a few differences, they are both
> equally stable. Neither is inferior to the other. My problems with
> Ubuntu are philosophical, not technical.
>
> --
> Bob Holtzman
> Key ID: 8D549279
> "If you think you're getting free lunch,
> check the price of the beer"
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
>
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
| Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
| [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | MR ZenWiz <mrzenwiz@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | Greg Madden <gomadtroll@gci.net> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | Michel-André <michelandre@micronator.org> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | Katheryne Draven <borgqueen4@gmail.com> |
| Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> |
| stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper | Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: pdf
- Next by Date: Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper
- Previous by thread: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper
- Next by thread: Re: stables Re: [libreoffice-users] Very unhappy camper
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.