Re: [libreoffice-projects] minutes for the LibreOffice QA call 2012-04-06 1400UTC

[Cor Nouws <oolst@nouenoff.nl>]

Hi,

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (06-04-12 19:55)

>    - CaseConductor evaluation
>      [...]
>    - Rainer: we need better documentation on the "why" of Litmus/MozTrap
>      [...]
>    - Kendy: Need for regular manual testing for update scenarios
>      [...]
>      - given the limited current reach of Litmus, we might propagate in blogs
>        too
>    - we really need to make structured manual a lot more visible for 3.6

I look forward to the outcome of the Litmus/MozTrap evaluation and 
improvements in this area. It will help people run the tests more 
easily. However, we must not forget that it's just that and not more.
Evaluation of the current situation showed some lack of available time 
with people considered to work with it (and other QA topics). Thus if we 
forget that, and only do improve the tooling... it might turn out to be 
fooling our selves.

Cheers,

--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted